Holistic Wisdom
Discreet Sex Toys

Shop Getting Started Sales & Specials New Items Reviews Resources Sex Guide About Us Orders Contact Us

Free Sex Toys!

FREE Shipping
On Orders Over $150

Low Price Guarantee



Products
ALL Products
Sex Toys For Women
Sex Toys For Men

Bedroom Gear
Adult Gifts
Getting Started

Education
Sexual Health Articles
FREE Newsletter
Sex In The News
Free Resources

Special Offers
Sales & Specials
Low Price Guarantee
Free Samples & Gifts
Free Shipping Promo
Make It A Gift Basket

Entertainment
Erotic Stories
Sex Jokes
Sexual Quotations

Hot Topics
Female Ejaculation
Fellatio
Cunnilingus
Prostate Massage
Anal Sex
Kegel Exercises

Security
Discreet Orders
No Spam
Confidential Services
Secure Site
Woman Business
Quality Products

Adult Gifts


Sex Toys Still Under Attack In Texas
 
         Our Sexual Rights Are Under Attack 10-2-06
           Case Ignacio Sergio Acosta vs. state of Texas, 05-1574.

In El Paso, Texas, September 2003 undercover police officers entered Trixx adult bookstore where they found “various sexual devices” for sale. They asked Ignacio Acosta, a employee, how to use a “crystal cock vibrator” on display, and he explained to the female officer that it could be used to arouse her to orgasm. The officers purchased the device and ten days later, Acosta was arrested.

Today the Supreme Court has refused to hear the case. The same court that agreed to hear the Anna Nicole case. Apparently, our sexual rights are simply not as important.


by
Lisa S. Lawless, RM, CEO

In Texas, it is not against the law to sell a sex toy, it is against the law to sell it and tell someone what it is intended for, because the Texas government insists that retailers lie about what it is they are selling by insisting retailers call them novelties. Thus, the officer was baiting the employee by asking how to use it.

It would be interesting to see the law enforced in a Wal-Mart by asking a employee what the "Ribbed For Her Pleasure" condoms are supposed to do. The law is not only inconsistent, and encourages dishonesty when it comes to sexual health, but it also violates the right of U.S. citizens to be able to be informed consumers of sexual health products.

The Supreme Court refused to consider if it is a crime and unconstitutional to promote sex toys shaped like sexual organs. The defendant, Acosta, is arguing that the law violates the right to sexual privacy.

Acosta’s lawyer filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, on the grounds that the statute unconstitutionally prevented Texans from enjoying dildo-type devices, which they have a right to do in the privacy of their homes. Based on the 2003 Supreme Court Lawrence v. Texas ruling that threw out sodomy statutes nationwide on privacy grounds, Acosta’s attorney argued that the state had no compelling justification for burdening adults who wish to exercise their privacy rights to use sex toys.

Chief Justice Richard Barajas wrote “It is appropriate for the State to act to protect the social interest in order, morality, and decency by restraining commercial dealing in non-communicative objects designed or marketed for use primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.” Barajas provided no explanation as to why selling a dildo in an adult bookstore presents any risk to order, morality, or decency.

Acosta’s lawyer, Santa Monica, Calif.-based Roger Diamond, urged the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case in light of conflicting rulings throughout the nation as to the sale of so-called obscene sex toys. The case will now go to the El Paso County court for trial.

Colorado and Louisiana courts say that laws banning the sale of sex toys on obscenity grounds are unconstitutional, while courts in Georgia, Mississippi and Texas have upheld sex toy bans.

Please read our article on the War on Sex Toys

Copyright © 2000-2008 The Holistic Wisdom Corporation
Namaste